TedHOhio wrote:

Maybe so, but it's been a small rock you haven't been able to crawl past. Oh you crawl plenty, but usually on your belly begging for more donations to fund your marketing. You really need to invest it in science. But I understand your reluctance. All you keep doing is supporting Evolution all over again. And it just pisses you off, doesn't bobbie?
-- Where is the science supporting the often heard whine that radiological dating is faulty?
-- Where is the science supporting Natural Selection is false?
-- Where is the science proving Random Mutation only kills babies?
-- Where is the science showing that Evolution violates thermodynamics?
-- And finally, where is the science supporting your contention of Intelligent Design?
in the Fiction section in the library, right next to the tea-leaf readers, psychics, and astrologers. In other words right where it belongs. In some poorly managed libraries it's in the section called "Religious Studies' even though you keep claiming that ID is not a religious proposition. Sure, bobbie, pull the other one.
Ted history does not piss me off. I don't recall me denying evolution. You may deny the story of Adam & Eve was found in caves drawn up by cavemen. Let's go to Atheist favorite story , Noah's Ark. Noah's Ark could actually be the story of God supervising another Extra Terristrial to deliver a box of bacteria to Earth. This bacteria was harnessed until intelligence capable of recording information showed up. Just as God had done many other times. See I think alot of Atheist have come to this conclussion also. To many human egos this is just too much. We're not the exact image of God. You would want to call what keeps The Universe going an engine , and you political correctness does prevail on this term. Hawkins and all the top brains will call it that on their documentaries and books , but I call it a heart not an engine. I could be wrong , but still someone built that engine.